Early warning system using primary healthcare data in the post-COVID-19-pandemic era: Brazil nationwide case-study (preprint)

BackgroundSyndromic surveillance utilising primary health care (PHC) data is a valuable tool for early outbreak detection, as demonstrated in the potential to identify COVID-19 outbreaks. However, the potential of such an early warning system in the post-COVID-19 era remains largely unexplored. MethodsWe analysed PHC encounter counts due to respiratory complaints registered in the Brazilian database of the Universal Health System between January and July 2023. We applied EARS (variation C1-C2-C3) and EVI to estimate the weekly thresholds. An alarm was determined when the number of encounters exceeded the week-specific threshold. We used data on hospitalisation due to respiratory disease to classify weeks in which the number of cases surpassed predetermined thresholds as anomalies. We compared EARS and EVIs efficacy in anticipating anomalies. FindingsA total of 119 anomalies were identified across 116 immediate regions during the study period. The EARS-C2 presented the highest early alarm rate, with 81/119 (68%) early alarms, and C1 the lowest, with 71 (60%) early alarms. The lowest true positivity was the EARS-C1 118/1354 (8.7%) and the highest EARS-C3 99/856 (11.6%). ConclusionRoutinely collected PHC data can be successfully used to detect respiratory disease outbreaks in Brazil. Syndromic surveillance enhances timeliness in surveillance strategies, albeit with lower specificity. A combined approach with other strategies is essential to strengthen accuracy, offering a proactive and effective public health response against future outbreaks.

Vaccine coverage and effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic and severe Covid-19 in indigenous people in Brazil: a cohort study (preprint)

Background Indigenous people have historically suffered devastating impacts from epidemics and continue to have lower access to healthcare and be especially vulnerable to respiratory infectious. We estimated the coverage and effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 cases among indigenous people in Brazil.Methods We linked nationwide Covid-19 vaccination data with flu-like surveillance records and studied a cohort of vaccinated indigenous people aged ≥ 5 years between 18th Jan 2021 and 1st Mar 2022. We considered individuals unexposed from the date they received the first dose of vaccine until the 13th day of vaccination, partially vaccinated from the 14th day after the first dose until the 13th day after receiving the second dose, and fully vaccinated onwards. We estimated the Covid-19 vaccination coverage and used Poisson regression to calculate the relative risks (RR) and vaccine effectiveness (VE) of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, and BNT162b2 against Covid-19 laboratory-confirmed cases incidence, mortality, hospitalisation, and hospital-progression to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or death. VE was estimated as (1-RR)*100, comparing unexposed to partially or fully vaccinated.Results By 1st Mar 2022, 48·7% (35·0–62·3) of eligible indigenous people vs 74·8% (57·9–91·8) overall Brazilians had been fully vaccinated for Covid-19. VE for the three Covid-19 vaccines combined was 53% (95%CI:44–60%) for symptomatic cases, 53% (95%CI:-56-86%) for mortality and 41% (95%CI:-35-75%) for hospitalisation. Among hospitalised patients, VE was 87% (95%CI:27–98%) for progression to ICU and 96% (95%CI: 90–99%) for death.Conclusions Lower coverage but similar Covid-19 VE among indigenous people than overall Brazilians suggest the need to expand access, timely vaccination, and urgently offer booster doses to achieve a great level of protection among this group.

Prevalence and risk factors for long COVID after mild disease: a longitudinal study with a symptomatic control group. (preprint)

Background There is limited data on the prevalence and risk factors for long COVID, with a shortage of prospective studies with appropriate control groups and adequate sample size. We therefore performed a prospective study to determine the prevalence and risk factors for long COVID. Methods We recruited patients age [≥] 15 years who were clinically suspected of having acute SARS-CoV-2 infection from September 2020 to April 2021. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for RT-PCR 3-5 days post symptom onset. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected using structured questionnaires from persons positive and negative for SARS-COV-2. Follow-up was performed by telephone interview to assess early outcomes and persistent symptoms. For COVID-19 cases, 5D-3L EuroQol questionnaire was used to assess the impact of symptoms on quality of life. Results We followed 814 participants (412 COVD-19 positive and 402 COVID-19 negative persons) of whom the majority (741 / 814) had mild symptoms. Both the COVID-19 positive and the COVID-19 negative groups had similar sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, except for the rate of hospitalization (15.8% vs 1.5%, respectively). One month after disease onset, 122 (29.6%) individuals reported residual symptoms in the COVID-19 positive group or the long COVID group versus 24 (6%) individuals in the COVID-19 negative group. In the long COVID group, fatigue, olfactory disorder, and myalgia were the most frequent symptoms which occurred in the acute phase. Compared to recovered patients, female sex, older age and having > 5 symptoms during the acute phase were risk factors for long COVID. Quality of life was evaluated in 102 out of 122 cases of long COVID with 57 (55.9%) reporting an impact in at least one dimension of the EuroQol 5D-3L questionnaire. Conclusion In this prospective study consisting predominantly of patients with mild disease, the persistence of symptoms after acute disease was highly associated with long COVID-19 (29.6% vs 6% of COVID negative group). The risk factors for long COVID were older age, female sex, and polysymptomatic acute disease.

Protection conferred by vaccine plus previous infection (hybrid immunity) with vaccines of three different platforms during the Omicron variant period in Brazil (preprint)

Hybrid immunity (infection plus vaccination) provided high protection against infection and severe disease in the periods of delta and gamma variants of concern. However, the protection of hybrid immunity in the Omicron era remains unknown. We performed a test-negative study using Brazilian national databases between January 01 and March 22, 2022, a period of predominant circulation of the Omicron variant in Brazil. Hybrid immunity offered low protection against infection, with rapid waning, compared to unvaccinated with or without previous infection. For severe illness (hospitalisation or death), the protection, although already high for unvaccinated pre-infected increased regardless of the type of vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S, BNT162b2, ChAdOx-1 or CoronaVac). In conclusion, during the Omicron-dominant period in Brazil, hybrid immunity offered high protection against severe illness and low protection against infection.

Effectiveness of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and Ad26.COV2.S among individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazil (preprint)

Background. COVID-19 vaccines have proven highly effective among SARS-CoV-2 naive individuals, but their effectiveness in preventing symptomatic infection and severe outcomes among individuals with prior infection is less clear. Methods. Utilizing national COVID-19 notification, hospitalization, and vaccination datasets from Brazil, we performed a case-control study using a test-negative design to assess the effectiveness of four vaccines (CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, Ad26.COV2.S and BNT162b2) among individuals with laboratory-confirmed prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. We matched RT-PCR positive, symptomatic COVID-19 cases with RT-PCR-negative controls presenting with symptomatic illnesses, restricting both groups to tests performed at least 90 days after an initial infection. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to compare the odds of test positivity, and the odds of hospitalization or death due to COVID-19, according to vaccination status and time since first or second dose of vaccines. Findings. Among individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic infection [≥] 14 days from vaccine series completion was 39.4% (95% CI 36.1-42.6) for CoronaVac, 56.0% (95% CI 51.4-60.2) for ChAdOx1, 44.0% (95% CI 31.5-54.2) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 64.8% (95% CI 54.9-72.4) for BNT162b2. For the two-dose vaccine series (CoronaVac, ChAdOx1, and BNT162b2), effectiveness against symptomatic infection was significantly greater after the second dose compared with the first dose. Effectiveness against hospitalization or death [≥] 14 days from vaccine series completion was 81.3% (95% CI 75.3-85.8) for CoronaVac, 89.9% (95% CI 83.5-93.8) for ChAdOx1, 57.7% (95% CI -2.6-82.5) for Ad26.COV2.S, and 89.7% (95% CI 54.3-97.7) for BNT162b2.